Home › Forums › Archives › Instant Messaging › Yahoo! Messenger Support › See invisible users
- This topic has 54 replies, 22 voices, and was last updated 21 years, 5 months ago by
foxefire.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 25, 2004 at 2:13 am #75917
Jeff Hester
KeymasterWell here is what I noticed with it and I can’t say I’m right but its a possibility .. when you use that program, if you try to sign in as invisible it gives me a runtime error, now when I let it log me in and I am visible I do not get the error. Go Figure.
Anyway the way to get around it is this , I sign in with an id and messenger NO one has and I don’t care if it logs me on or not then I don’t get the error message and I don’t have to worry about being visible.
July 25, 2004 at 5:13 am #75954EliteNick
MemberJustified…hate to tell you but, you’re supposed to login with a backup ID of yours, aka a “bot”. Not the ID you are currently on lol. And as for Oreo, well if that is the case then you should take out your signiture where it says “I am currently bootylicious”, some 13 year old may find that objectionable. 😀
July 25, 2004 at 4:18 pm #75925Oreo
MemberElite….THIS is your last warning….YOU are not here to tell ANYONE, much less a MODERATOR what to do.
July 25, 2004 at 4:22 pm #75919Jeff Hester
KeymasterQuote:quote:Originally posted by EliteNickJustified…hate to tell you but, you’re supposed to login with a backup ID of yours, aka a “bot”. Not the ID you are currently on lol. And as for Oreo, well if that is the case then you should take out your signiture where it says “I am currently bootylicious”, some 13 year old may find that objectionable. 😀
Get a grip, dude! I sent you an email explaining what I felt was appropriate (or inappropriate). I know you were trying to be funny, but it’s not cool to lock horns with our moderators on this issue.
July 25, 2004 at 10:46 pm #75955EliteNick
MemberI realize that, and I wrote you back 3 e-mails. It has been almost 2 days and I’ve recieved no response. “Oreo”, I am not telling you what to do, merely suggesting. It’s just kind of annoying you all ban my site without first e-mailing me asking to remove or lock away the content. I did so and e-mailed Jeff back 3 times as I said above. If it is still going to be banned I will simply no longer visit these forums and will take the link off from my site. Jeff if you didn’t get the e-mails then we need to communicate through a different system. I can copy and paste them in something else. I’m out
July 26, 2004 at 6:19 pm #75928shifter
ParticipantYou requested we send any email to elitenickdotcom@aol.com and that is where it was sent. Check your spam filter.
July 26, 2004 at 7:17 pm #75956EliteNick
MemberI did, nothing. Server possibly banned from AOL? My site is back up so you can e-mail to admin@[domain deleted – family friendly links only!], thanks
July 28, 2004 at 12:01 am #75963freeskye
MemberTry this one guys: Its called Buddy Online Checker. So far its working.
EDIT: Sorry, this site has some things like ID stealers on it and we can’t promote those things. If you can link to it without the site, or I bet Shifter would host it. Thank you for understanding. 🙂
July 31, 2004 at 2:16 am #75957EliteNick
MemberWell, I doubt you’re allowed to post that link because it has links to booter-related sites, but I am not sure the online checkers will work at all anymore, Yahoo! has been doing some patching and updating lately.
July 31, 2004 at 2:37 am #75920Jeff Hester
KeymasterJust a friendly reminder folks… please don’t post links to sites with booters or they WILL be removed. Keep posting them and YOU will be removed.
July 31, 2004 at 3:45 am #75958EliteNick
MemberWell, I wanted to correct his link but then I saw how it had booter site links :p so I tried doing both at once lol even though I kind of contradicted myself. Anyway, like I said, I do not think any program that you need to login a bot first to do something (like the new online checkers) don’t work anymore, I’ve been getting IM’s, people saying the ID’s won’t login. There should be newer versions out soon though after the programmers sniff the new packets for logging in (if that is what was changed).
July 31, 2004 at 4:38 am #75927David
ParticipantQuote:quote:Originally posted by EliteNickWell, I wanted to correct his link but then I saw how it had booter site links :p so I tried doing both at once lol even though I kind of contradicted myself. Anyway, like I said, I do not think any program that you need to login a bot first to do something (like the new online checkers) don’t work anymore, I’ve been getting IM’s, people saying the ID’s won’t login. There should be newer versions out soon though after the programmers sniff the new packets for logging in (if that is what was changed).
Yeah, you contradicted yourself, and you violated the rules, but you knew what you were doing when you violated them, so what do you have to say for yourself?
At this board we work hard to keep it clean. We instate rules that all members must follow, and if they don’t, they have their account terminated. If you do not comply with the rules you will be removed. It is as simple as that.
If you feel that you can’t comply with the rules, then you can leave right now, it’s as simple as that.
July 31, 2004 at 9:46 am #75921spiderman
MemberMy Y!Invis Scanner still works. No problems yet.
July 31, 2004 at 1:58 pm #75964sarahtowny
MemberPersonally I if want to be invisible it’s because I might just want a one to one conversation with someone with no interuptions or just not in the mood to talk to that person lol. If someone kept on sending me messages when I was offline I think I would soon realise they had something to check my status and would not be on my friends list for very much longer! But hey that’s just my opinion 😎
July 31, 2004 at 3:28 pm #75926Oreo
MemberI completely agree with you Sarah. There’s something about the violation of privacy that really gets on my nerves.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.