- This topic has 6 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 22 years, 5 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Has AOL made changes in the Warning Protocol? Because I have noticed lately it is operating differently. I just wish AOL would abolish the system all together; the only use it provides is to allow one to manifest childish anger against another on the Internet for pure amusement. Today some punk decided to pose as a three different girls in a chat room to talk to me, then just randomly decided to warn me to will just be a punk now I have to wait out, till my screen name falls below the warning sign on limit to get back online. But I was unable to warn back, I was able to before out of defense. Does anyone know the science behind it? I have noted it warning level drops 1% after a few minutes, then 3% for each hour thereafter. When I don’t want to talk to someone, I block them not warn them. What is the point of the warning system? I just wish AOL would abolish the system all together.
I recently noticed it acting differently too and started a topic but no one responded. 🙁 Anyway, maybe this will get some more attention, and possibly someone can confirm or reject this?
I dont know its stupid. Probably because they wanted something similar to “Notify” without paying more employees to read through complaints for a service they provide for free.
Well so what you get warned, if your an a-hole you still have your screen name the next day … this is what blocking is for
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.