Home › Forums › Archives › Computer Support › Computer Support Discussion › Amazing Computers!
- This topic has 31 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 22 years ago by
FirefoxMan.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 27, 2004 at 6:06 am #41327
ys8er2323
Memberanymore?
July 27, 2004 at 7:26 am #41311Charles
Member
2 AMD Opteron Processors (model 250)
1 Mb L2 cache/processor
Quadro FX3000 Graphics
4 GB RAM (4 @ 1-GB DIMMS)
10000 RPM Ultra320 SCSI Disk Drive @ 73 Gb
5 USB ports
2 Firewire ports
1 Parallel port
1 Serial port
1 AGP 8x slot
5 PCI-X slots
DVD-ROM/CD-RW Drive
Solaris OS or Linux
…with an insane price of: $8,695.00THE MOST AMAZING HARDWARE I HAVE SEEN:

For almost 3.2 million USD, you get:
Sun Fire 25K Server
18 Processor/Memory Uniboards
72 1.05-GHz UltraSPARC s400 Processors
16-MB ECC External Cache per Processor
288-GB Memory
2 System Controllers
6 Power Supplies
8 Fan Trays
9 PCI+ I/O Assemblies
1 Quad FastEthernet PCI Adapter
1 Dual Gigabit Ethernet + Dual SCSI PCI Adapter
1 Sun StorEdge S1 Disk Array
1 External Expansion Rack
ServerStart Installation Service for up to 18 Domains
Sun Java Enterprise System
Sun Remote Services Net Connect Software
Storage Automated Diagnostic Environment Software
CPU Diagnostics Monitor Software
Solaris 8 2/04 Operating EnvironmentSo much computing power, damn…unbelievable. Probably makes an incredible datacenter…heh. Too bad I’ll see one of those in life…:mad: Just the presence…okay I’m done…
July 28, 2004 at 12:35 am #41328ys8er2323
Member3.2 Million!!!!! Are you serious?!?!
July 28, 2004 at 12:46 am #41337AwesomeSauce
ParticipantYa know, there’s a 400 GB hard drive now.
July 28, 2004 at 12:46 am #41313David
ParticipantQuote:quote:Originally posted by ys8er23233.2 Million!!!!! Are you serious?!?!
Uh, of course he is? Did you miss this part?:
72 1.05-GHz UltraSPARC s400 Processors
16-MB ECC External Cache per Processor
288-GB MemoryJuly 28, 2004 at 5:03 am #41329ys8er2323
MemberQuote:quote:Originally posted by AwesomeSauceYa know, there’s a 400 GB hard drive now.
ya, you know theres a 2 terrabyte hard drive now.
July 29, 2004 at 8:04 pm #41339FirefoxMan
Memberwhy hasn’t anyone mentioned the mac in here… although i’m a windows user currently, i’ve been converted to a mac lover (i’m getting a mac in a few months too!). I mean, they’re VERY stable. most mac owners NEVER see the blue screen of death…. EVER. I have the “blue screen o death” all the time. I just had to re-install XP just the other day for no apparent reason, just turned the damn thing on and windows was corrupted (and we update norton 2004 daily, plus we have ad-aware and zone alarm, both of which are used daily as well). but that’s beside the point. mac’s are fast, look AMAZING, and have some of the best programs out there (don’t you find it ironic that Office X 2004 is actually BETTER than the current verision of Office for windows?)
July 30, 2004 at 4:07 am #41314David
ParticipantQuote:quote:Originally posted by FirefoxManwhy hasn’t anyone mentioned the mac in here… although i’m a windows user currently, i’ve been converted to a mac lover (i’m getting a mac in a few months too!). I mean, they’re VERY stable. most mac owners NEVER see the blue screen of death…. EVER. I have the “blue screen o death” all the time. I just had to re-install XP just the other day for no apparent reason, just turned the damn thing on and windows was corrupted (and we update norton 2004 daily, plus we have ad-aware and zone alarm, both of which are used daily as well). but that’s beside the point. mac’s are fast, look AMAZING, and have some of the best programs out there (don’t you find it ironic that Office X 2004 is actually BETTER than the current verision of Office for windows?)
Computers don’t need to be idiot-proof, if you use your head, they are pretty easy to use. I rarely, really see a blue screen on any of my Windows systems. The only times I’ve ever seen it was when I installed the wrong version of a driver, and when I had a back memory module.
Computers aren’t meant to think for you, and they aren’t meant to catch the user from making stupid mistakes, people that think they should do this for them are the ones that shouldn’t be allowed to use one.
My Windows systems are stable and as secure as I can make them (I won’t say windows is secure), I know what I’m doing, it’s not that hard, I can’t stand when people say that Mac’s are better because they are more stable or easier to use. Windows NT is pretty damn stable, if it’s not then you are doing something wrong.
no offense dude. 🙂
August 1, 2004 at 6:35 am #41340FirefoxMan
MemberQuote:quote:Originally posted by DavidQuote:quote:Originally posted by FirefoxManwhy hasn’t anyone mentioned the mac in here… although i’m a windows user currently, i’ve been converted to a mac lover (i’m getting a mac in a few months too!). I mean, they’re VERY stable. most mac owners NEVER see the blue screen of death…. EVER. I have the “blue screen o death” all the time. I just had to re-install XP just the other day for no apparent reason, just turned the damn thing on and windows was corrupted (and we update norton 2004 daily, plus we have ad-aware and zone alarm, both of which are used daily as well). but that’s beside the point. mac’s are fast, look AMAZING, and have some of the best programs out there (don’t you find it ironic that Office X 2004 is actually BETTER than the current verision of Office for windows?)
Computers don’t need to be idiot-proof, if you use your head, they are pretty easy to use. I rarely, really see a blue screen on any of my Windows systems. The only times I’ve ever seen it was when I installed the wrong version of a driver, and when I had a back memory module.
Computers aren’t meant to think for you, and they aren’t meant to catch the user from making stupid mistakes, people that think they should do this for them are the ones that shouldn’t be allowed to use one.
My Windows systems are stable and as secure as I can make them (I won’t say windows is secure), I know what I’m doing, it’s not that hard, I can’t stand when people say that Mac’s are better because they are more stable or easier to use. Windows NT is pretty damn stable, if it’s not then you are doing something wrong.
no offense dude. 🙂
heh… i’m NOT doing anything wrong. I don’t download, and i’m very concious of my online habits. I do windows update, norton update (i run nortons scans too every other day). just face it windows sucks, and i’m 15, don’t know about comps like you prolly do. but i’m one of the most careful ppl when it comes to comps, b/c we can’t afford to just buy a new comp all the time cuz of carelessness, so again, i’m careful. and try and take superb care of my comp. I just think its windows, and next time lose the tone “oh mighty computer guru”
August 1, 2004 at 6:39 am #41315David
ParticipantQuote:quote:Originally posted by FirefoxManQuote:quote:Originally posted by DavidQuote:quote:Originally posted by FirefoxManwhy hasn’t anyone mentioned the mac in here… although i’m a windows user currently, i’ve been converted to a mac lover (i’m getting a mac in a few months too!). I mean, they’re VERY stable. most mac owners NEVER see the blue screen of death…. EVER. I have the “blue screen o death” all the time. I just had to re-install XP just the other day for no apparent reason, just turned the damn thing on and windows was corrupted (and we update norton 2004 daily, plus we have ad-aware and zone alarm, both of which are used daily as well). but that’s beside the point. mac’s are fast, look AMAZING, and have some of the best programs out there (don’t you find it ironic that Office X 2004 is actually BETTER than the current verision of Office for windows?)
Computers don’t need to be idiot-proof, if you use your head, they are pretty easy to use. I rarely, really see a blue screen on any of my Windows systems. The only times I’ve ever seen it was when I installed the wrong version of a driver, and when I had a back memory module.
Computers aren’t meant to think for you, and they aren’t meant to catch the user from making stupid mistakes, people that think they should do this for them are the ones that shouldn’t be allowed to use one.
My Windows systems are stable and as secure as I can make them (I won’t say windows is secure), I know what I’m doing, it’s not that hard, I can’t stand when people say that Mac’s are better because they are more stable or easier to use. Windows NT is pretty damn stable, if it’s not then you are doing something wrong.
no offense dude. 🙂
heh… i’m NOT doing anything wrong. I don’t download, and i’m very concious of my online habits. I do windows update, norton update (i run nortons scans too every other day). just face it windows sucks, and i’m 15, don’t know about comps like you prolly do. but i’m one of the most careful ppl when it comes to comps, b/c we can’t afford to just buy a new comp all the time cuz of carelessness, so again, i’m careful. and try and take superb care of my comp. I just think its windows, and next time lose the tone “oh mighty computer guru”
I’m 15 too. I never said windows doesn’t suck, I just hate when people say that Macs are ‘easier’ to use, and that’s why they are better. Anyway dude, don’t take it personally.
August 1, 2004 at 8:24 am #41330ys8er2323
Membermac’s suck. I mean why do they have to make an entirely diff. system
i hate it, windows is more organized. apple and its “i-gear” are just hype.August 1, 2004 at 9:38 am #41341FirefoxMan
Memberi don’t think that macs are better b/c they’re easier to use. theyre more stable… and arent seceptible to viruses like windows. and windows isnt more organized…. there’s so much crap that comes with it, and you have to search forever to find something you need. your desktop is usually crowded w/ icons. macs don’t have this problem, the finder has EVERYTHING under like 5 folders… everything in alphabetical order. and the reason they use a different system is for the stability aspect, and a few other things too i’m sure. but lilnux is built off of unix. unix is actually built for stability, ms-dos isn’t. if you haven’t figured it out, unix is to macs as ms-dos is to windows. but most of us don’t even see ms-dos or unix for that matter, its all in the background. and yeah, the iGear crap does get old. but the mac’s sys. is the most powerful computer out there right now. the Power Mac G5 is the most expensive and best comp out there. and I believe that unix has been changed a bit, it’s been updated. I mean, ms-dos has been the same… with no changes for years… I think that’s the reason its so unstable compared to unix. microsoft doesn’t really work on making ms-dos more stable… I dunno why, i’m sure i’m wrong about that assumption though. ah yes… something else. while microsoft uses its THOUSANDS of computer ppl to help develope the next generation operating system, apple has had 100 DEVELOPERS for quite a while. that’s right, just 100, and they’ve still got a better program running than microsoft. call me crazy, but all the above sure makes microsoft look bad, and i’m currently using a windows comp.
August 1, 2004 at 4:54 pm #41316David
ParticipantQuote:quote:Originally posted by FirefoxManthere’s so much crap that comes with it, and you have to search forever to find something you need. your desktop is usually crowded w/ icons. macs don’t have this problem, the finder has EVERYTHING under like 5 folders…
You just proved my point, you think Mac’s are easier to use.
If you want to change a system setting, you go into the Control panel.
If you want to access your files, you go into Computer
If you want to access the network, you go to My Network Places.Pretty damn easy, I’m not sure what you could be ‘searching forever’ for, it’s generally logical.
I know that Linux and Mac OS is built off UNIX, I’m a Linux user myself, and I like the design, and how it is setup. but you are wrong, Windows is NOT MS-DOS. Windows 95/98/Me were build off of the MS-DOS core, not really the greatest idea. Windows NT/2000 and XP are built on Windows NT. Windows NT is incredibly stable.
Of course Windows is more susceptible Viri, why the hell would anyone write a virus for a Mac when most of the computer users use Windows?! I’m sure that viri can and have been written for Mac OS.
What comes with windows that is ‘a lot of crap’? And why do you need an icon for everything on your desktop? You can remove all the icons from your desktop if you want, it doesn’t have to be crowded if you don’t want it to be.
Oh, and lastly, ‘computer ppl’ are much different than developers.
August 2, 2004 at 1:39 am #41312Charles
MemberI think we all can agree that there are differences and similarities between the Operating Systems mentioned above…
That being said, neither is better than another. Case closed.Their are advantages to a few in different situations, but that is a good thing. Macs are supposed to be better with image editing, Windows is compatible with just about everything out there (virii too), and *nix is stable and secure. This bickering is pointless…this thread is supposed to be about “amazing” computers, not about OSes.
Now will somebody pleeease post a machine that is too l33t to run Windows or Mac so we can get back on topic???
August 2, 2004 at 7:30 am #41331ys8er2323
Memberyes anymore computers that are amazing?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.