Home › Forums › Archives › Instant Messaging › Yahoo! Messenger Support › "Anti" buddy spy – Is there?
- This topic has 31 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 21 years ago by
pinky.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 5, 2005 at 9:51 pm #120988
Nessa
Participantfd64stang wrote:Hmmmm …. EXACTLY … If it is to be “OK” to use Buddy Spy – why should it not be ok to use Anti Buddy Spy ?? Now we are back to the “All is fair in love and war” remark. If both were released, then both sides would have the tendency to feel it was a “fair” game. If you choose to use Buddy Spy then you should be aware someone could be checking in on you, just as you are doing to them. 😀
I never said anything about any of them not being “ok,” simply the fact being that if Anti-Buddy came out i think people would use Buddy Spy less, since they don’t wanna get caught scanning people, so the need for Anti-Buddy would die as well. Why end up killing two programs? And as you said “if you choose to use Buddy Spy,” it now becomes a choice if the Anti-Buddy program got released, now people have to decide if they wanna risk scanning or not, reducing the use of the program. But that is just my opinion, Unsakred, gets last say in this, in the end.May 6, 2005 at 4:04 am #120970fd64stang
MemberOf course Unsakred gets the last say – it’s his program. I personally do not use Buddy Spy – and it’s nothing against Unsakred – He is very good at what he does. I feel it is an invasion of my privacy to be “checked on” in such a manner. Don’t get me wrong, I am aware there are several “manual” ways to check online status of everyone. Also, it helps create hard feelings between friends and such if they find out “so-n-so” is hiding from them, even if they truly aren’t “hiding” from anyone. We all have came on the pager, curious to see who’s online while being invisible ourselves. I see no problem with that. If we choose to become “available” great – if we don’t that’s our choice. How about people who have constant connections and leave their pagers on while invisible even though they aren’t at the computer? Granted, the majority should act more like adults and not have issues with someone not being available to them. In my opinion, programs such as these simply cause unneeded problems and I think Unsakred could use his talents for bigger and better things. 😀
Besides, if people do get to feeling uncomfortable with being “caught” – isn’t that a clue that maybe it isn’t right to do ??????
May 6, 2005 at 4:16 am #120989Nessa
ParticipantWell yeah all points are valid, but this isn’t the thread about the morals of using Buddy Spy or whether or not it should be used. This was the thread on Anti-Buddy and i think everyone is entitled to their opinions on things, and i just wanted to make mine known. And i just gave my thoughts on what the release of Anti-Buddy would cause.
May 6, 2005 at 6:19 am #120971fd64stang
MemberI done the same. I’m not trying to argue with you or anyone else. My point is – if Buddy Spy is going to stay – why not release the Anti-Buddy Spy as well. That way it is fair. At least with the Anti-Buddy your only checking who is being nosey with you – not everyone.
May 6, 2005 at 7:07 am #120992Dobrin
MemberWhy do we need Anti-Buddy when the Buddy-Spy is NOT working :confused:
May 6, 2005 at 10:07 am #120980UnSaKreD
MemberDobrin wrote:Why do we need Anti-Buddy when the Buddy-Spy is NOT working :confused:Buddy spy does work; any problems with buddy spy are usually a P.E.B.K.C.(Problem exists between keyboard and chair)
May 6, 2005 at 3:06 pm #120974oliezekat
Member@UnSaKreD]Buddy spy does work any problems with buddy spy are usually a P.E.B.K.C.(Problem exists between keyboard and chair)[/QUOTE wrote:
:o)))))))))))))) I will add it to auto-responder for YMessengerPlus support !
May 18, 2005 at 6:18 am #120981UnSaKreD
MemberHehehe, yes its a good one.. And generally way to often its true
May 19, 2005 at 5:28 am #120986dan-i-am
Memberfd64stang wrote:I done the same. I’m not trying to argue with you or anyone else. My point is – if Buddy Spy is going to stay – why not release the Anti-Buddy Spy as well. That way it is fair. At least with the Anti-Buddy your only checking who is being nosey with you – not everyone.OMG… Quick, someone call Bill Gates and have him create a tool that will expose everyone known exploit for Windows!
Sometimes, I just can’t believe what I’m reading in these posts :rolleyes:
– dan –
May 19, 2005 at 12:48 pm #120973fd64stang
MemberOMG… Quick, someone call Bill Gates and have him create a tool that will expose everyone known exploit for Windows!
Sometimes, I just can’t believe what I’m reading in these posts :rolleyes:
– dan –
Ohhhhhhhh … and I suppose Buddy Spy isn’t using the same “exploits”??? You just don’t like the idea of someone seeing what you are trying to do to them. Turn about isn’t fair game ?
May 19, 2005 at 1:13 pm #120983UnSaKreD
MemberIm not saying I wont release it;
Im simply stating if I do release it, it probably wont be for free.
I will make the exception of giving it to a few people, that have helped create buddy spy, i.e. suggestions, beta testers, etc.
But in general, it will probably not be for free…
May 19, 2005 at 2:57 pm #120972fd64stang
MemberThank you UnSaKreD, that was what wanted to know. I wasn’t trying to turn this into a “debate” originally, but sometimes …. YOU KNOW !! 😉
May 19, 2005 at 3:30 pm #120982UnSaKreD
Memberlol its ok 🙂
July 12, 2005 at 11:43 pm #120993pinky
MemberSo finally had it been released by now any Anti Buddy Spy thing? or hadn’t?
I would really like to know it, if not also 2 use it.September 29, 2005 at 12:54 am #120963d0_the_deww
MemberUnSaKreD FD64 may have something there think about that you could get rich
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.