- This topic has 20 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 18 years, 3 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
WOOT :woot:
Much anticipated. It doesn’t look super different, but at least the wait is over, haha.
Yeah, I still see version 2 out there. And that’s only when the site isn’t returning an error message. They were aiming for 5 million downloads, but I think they’ll be glad to get 5 thousand today.
What a debacle.
Tigerblade;230799 wrote:Yeah, I still see version 2 out there. And that’s only when the site isn’t returning an error message. They were aiming for 5 million downloads, but I think they’ll be glad to get 5 thousand today.What a debacle.
You mean you don’t see the download link for 3.0? That’s strange; the link has been up for me since at least 1PM Pacific :confused:
It may have been something to do with the corporate filter. I tried refreshing, clearing the cache, the whole works.
Now that I’m home I got through to download it immediately.
They’re already past 3 million downloads. Hell, there’s so many people trying to access Mozilla’s sites, that they keep going down. In fact, the download counter is kinda broken, since it isn’t updating too fast anymore.
Personally, I love Firefox 3.0 and am quite pleased with it.
David;230800 wrote:I’m on whatever the latest RC is, but I can’t get the updater to actually fetch the latest version.RC2 and RC3 = final version.
@Kudo 230809 wrote:
RC2 and RC3 = final version.
RC2 and RC3 are release candidates, not final versions.
So I just updated to 3.0 on my Macbook, and now this is a slightly more drastic change. Now it looks like… Safari… :crying:
Ven0m;230821 wrote:Yeah, but RC3 was released as the final regardless (same hashes).Thank you Ven0m for clarifying that and to me more clear RC3 was spun because of a bug in the OSX version, so the Windows RC2 and RC3 are the same.
@Kudo 230835 wrote:
Thank you Ven0m for clarifying that and to me more clear RC3 was spun because of a bug in the OSX version, so the Windows RC2 and RC3 are the same.
My apologies – I had no idea that that’s what happened.
David;230838 wrote:My apologies – I had no idea that that’s what happened.There is no need to apologize. We are all here to help, learn and share 🙂
I’m all for the speed and memory improvements, but I’m not so sure how I feel about the slightly-different GUI. I suppose it’s fine. The downloads window seems to have actually taken a step backward, considering the fact you have to double click on the file in order to open it. Before, I only had to click once, but now twice? Come on, I didn’t order a gym membership.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.