Home › Forums › Archives › Community Center › The BigBlueBall Lounge › Music Room › iPod Mini vs. iRiVER
- This topic has 15 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 21 years, 7 months ago by
CoolMinded.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 21, 2004 at 8:10 pm #14894
detn8r
ParticipantOK, so I was looking into getting an MP3 player for Christmas. I wanted to listen in style with an iPod mini, but the iRiVER also caught my attention.
Does anyone have any experiences with an iPod (or iPod Mini) and or iRiVER?
The following were what I was looking at:
Apple iPod Mini 4GB Digital Player $382.95 (after taxes – CDN)
iRiVER iFP-799T1GB w/ FM Tuner & Recorder $322.00 (after taxes – CDN)Could I get anyone’s opinion or inputs? Thanks all 🙂
November 22, 2004 at 12:24 am #105576detn8r
ParticipantOK, so I’ve decided to do a comparision of the two. (ref: http://detn8r.info/ipod.html)
Does anyone have an opinion?
November 22, 2004 at 12:35 am #105582Spike
MemberYeah, I have an opinion: iRiVER is bad. Really bad. I had a 64MB player, and ended up trading it in for something better. It just had really bad quality music and mine did NOT play WMA’s, even though it said it did on the box.
Now, iPod, on the other hand, I trust. They have made excellent quality hardware, and now with the iPod Photo out, their company is going to just grow and grow. So I vote iPod Mini all the way.
November 22, 2004 at 12:59 am #105573Jeff Hester
KeymasterMy friend has an iRiver HP 120 and it works fine and I honestly like it better than my cousin’s iPod equivalent of the 20gb player. Anyway as to your choices, I would suggest the iPod mini even though it is 60 more bucks since you do get more space and honestly, when will you really use FM tuner and voice recording? What for? The bad thing about the iPod mini is that the battery is not user replaceable unlike the iRiver iFP-799.
You can check out these sites for reviews:
iRiver iFP-799
(Make sure to click on the link for iFP-790 since they are practically the same thing)November 22, 2004 at 1:05 am #105583camster
Memberwell, do you need the things that iRiver has like holding any file type? if you wouldn’t REALLY need that, I would definitely go iPod. I’ve found something out. If you get an iRiver, you’ll end up saying, “Hey, let me go get my mp3 player”. If you get the iPod, you’ll say, “Hey, let me go get my iPod.” You wouldn’t say iRiver for iRiver, and you wouldn’t say mp3 player for iPod. iPod has revolutionized mp3 players, putting them in their own class. If money is the same on each of them, I would definitely get an iPod. I’m saving up myself. ($104.00 left)
November 22, 2004 at 1:19 am #105581lazyturbo
MemberYea, looks like the iPod is the better choice in terms of what they give you and the looks:). Seems like the only good thing about the iRiVER is the FM Tuner and Voice Recorder, which I would like to have on an MP3 player. I hope they add it to the next generation of iPods.
The real question that should be asked is whether to get an iPod Mini, or an iPod.
January 5, 2005 at 2:17 am #105585AzNSoldier
ParticipantiRiver would be better in that comparison chart.. The playing time is longer than the iPods.. 40 hour battery life… While it take’s 4 hours for Mini iPod’s battery to charge!!
oh yeah! A USB for people with no FIREWIRE port 😉February 8, 2005 at 12:48 am #105579Someguy03
MemberAzNSoldier, the Ipod supports USB 2.0, and the Shuffle supports 1.1 and 2.0, so ya. 😛
February 8, 2005 at 2:47 am #105575Jeff Hester
KeymasterEveryone that I know who has an iPod (including my technologically-challenged daughter)…LOVES IT. The interface, the feel, the usability. iPod is difficult to beat. Plus you get more cool points with an iPod. 😉
February 8, 2005 at 3:25 am #105586AzNSoldier
ParticipantWell yeah.. the iPod is nice like I said before but I would rather buy an iRiver :D. I have some friends with iPod and they always tell me their in iPod heaver, lol. So when I get an iRiver i’ll probably be in iRiver heaven :D. iPod is great though and it got better reviews than the iRiver.
February 8, 2005 at 8:41 pm #105580Someguy03
MemberAzNSoldier wrote:Well yeah.. the iPod is nice like I said before but I would rather buy an iRiver :D. I have some friends with iPod and they always tell me their in iPod heaver, lol. So when I get an iRiver i’ll probably be in iRiver heaven :D. iPod is great though and it got better reviews than the iRiver.The new Iriver H10 is pretty sexy (color screen), but still doesnt top the Ipod in terms of looks:
February 8, 2005 at 10:09 pm #105577detn8r
ParticipantSomeguy03 wrote:The new Iriver H10 is pretty sexy (color screen), but still doesnt top the Ipod in terms of looks:http://www.weblogsinc.com/common/images/4474826503758026.jpg?0.2519627776795217I totally DISAGREE. That is the sexiest MP3 player evah. :p
February 8, 2005 at 10:24 pm #105574Jeff Hester
KeymasterI’m definitely getting myself an Iriver H10 for my birthday next month. I saw it at Best Buy a couple of days ago. It’s a nice fit in a hand and it’s wicked sexy looking.
February 9, 2005 at 1:16 am #105584DrBroccoli
ParticipantI would go ipod, you get 3 more Gigs of storages and if a FM tuner is that important to you than you can by a third party one called itrip from http://www.griffintechnology.com you can also get an italk from there for voice recording, the site also has many other cool add-ons for ipods like airclick, a remote add-on for ipods to control it with a remote. I say go for ipod, besides you also get the “cool factor”
Oh and why your at it, get a tunejuice from there, battery back-up for ipodsFebruary 9, 2005 at 2:57 am #105578detn8r
ParticipantWell, anyway I thought I had posted before, but I went with the iPod Mini.
I am definitely going to get an iSkin, but some of these addons for it, may be hard to come across in Canada. Are these available at your local Best Buy? Do I have to order them online via US dollars? Any more info? 🙂
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
